Qlink Estate 50 vs Vento Zip r3i Turbocam (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Qlink Estate 50stacks up against the Vento Zip r3i Turbocam. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Qlink Estate 50 | Vento Zip r3i Turbocam |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2013 |
| Price | $1,650 | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 5 hp |
| Torque | 4 Nm | 9 Nm |
| Weight | 95 kg | 65 kg |
| Seat height | 31 mm | 29 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.8 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. ABS |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 100/60-12 / 100/60-12 |
Qlink Estate 50 vs Vento Zip r3i Turbocam — which should you buy?
Picking between the Qlink Estate 50 and the Vento Zip r3i Turbocam usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Qlink Estate 50 brings 4 hp in a 95 kg package, while the Vento Zip r3i Turbocam counters with 5 hp at 65 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: