Qlink MT 250 vs CCM X-TR250 (2016)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Qlink MT 250stacks up against the CCM X-TR250. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Qlink MT 250 | CCM X-TR250 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2016 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 249 cc | 249 cc |
| Horsepower | 24 hp | 24 hp |
| Torque | 17 Nm | — |
| Weight | 127 kg | 113 kg |
| Seat height | 37 mm | 36 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.1 L | 2.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Hydraulic |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Hydraulic |
| Tires | 110/70-17 / 140/70-17 | — |
Qlink MT 250 vs CCM X-TR250 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Qlink MT 250 and the CCM X-TR250 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Qlink MT 250 brings 24 hp in a 127 kg package, while the CCM X-TR250 counters with 24 hp at 113 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: