Qlink MT 250 vs TM Racing FT 250 Flat Track (2016)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Qlink MT 250stacks up against the TM Racing FT 250 Flat Track. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Qlink MT 250 | TM Racing FT 250 Flat Track |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2016 | 2016 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 249 cc | 249 cc |
| Horsepower | 24 hp | — |
| Torque | 17 Nm | — |
| Weight | 127 kg | — |
| Seat height | 37 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 2.1 L | 2.2 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Wave disk with Nissin pump and Brembo caliper |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Wave disk with Nissin pump and caliper |
| Tires | 110/70-17 / 140/70-17 | 90/90-19 / 140/80-19 |
Qlink MT 250 vs TM Racing FT 250 Flat Track — which should you buy?
Picking between the Qlink MT 250 and the TM Racing FT 250 Flat Track usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Qlink MT 250 brings 24 hp in a 127 kg package, while the TM Racing FT 250 Flat Track counters with its own power figure.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: