Qlink Rave 50 vs MBK Waap (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Qlink Rave 50stacks up against the MBK Waap. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Qlink Rave 50 | MBK Waap |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 9 hp |
| Torque | 3 Nm | 4 Nm |
| Weight | 77 kg | 106 kg |
| Seat height | — | 29 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.6 L | 1.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 130/60-13 / 130/60-13 | 100/90-10 / 100/90-10 |
Qlink Rave 50 vs MBK Waap — which should you buy?
Picking between the Qlink Rave 50 and the MBK Waap usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Qlink Rave 50 brings 3 hp in a 77 kg package, while the MBK Waap counters with 9 hp at 106 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: