Qlink Siena 150 vs UM Matrix 150 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Qlink Siena 150stacks up against the UM Matrix 150. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Qlink Siena 150 | UM Matrix 150 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 150 cc | 150 cc |
| Horsepower | 8 hp | 10 hp |
| Torque | 9 Nm | 10 Nm |
| Weight | 101 kg | 102 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.4 L | 1.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 |
Qlink Siena 150 vs UM Matrix 150 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Qlink Siena 150 and the UM Matrix 150 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Qlink Siena 150 brings 8 hp in a 101 kg package, while the UM Matrix 150 counters with 10 hp at 102 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: