Qlink Star 50 vs Generic Onyx 50 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Qlink Star 50stacks up against the Generic Onyx 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Qlink Star 50 | Generic Onyx 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | $1,399 | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | 5 Nm | 4 Nm |
| Weight | 77 kg | 102 kg |
| Seat height | 34 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.6 L | 1.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | — |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | — |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 | 80/80-16 / 90/80-16 |
Qlink Star 50 vs Generic Onyx 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Qlink Star 50 and the Generic Onyx 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Qlink Star 50 brings 3 hp in a 77 kg package, while the Generic Onyx 50 counters with 3 hp at 102 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: