Qlink Star 50 vs Gilera Runner 50 SP Simoncelli (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Qlink Star 50stacks up against the Gilera Runner 50 SP Simoncelli. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Qlink Star 50 | Gilera Runner 50 SP Simoncelli |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | $1,399 | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 5 hp |
| Torque | 5 Nm | 5 Nm |
| Weight | 77 kg | — |
| Seat height | 34 mm | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.6 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Hydraulic with Ø 220 mm stainless steel disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc. Hydraulic with Ø 175 mm stainless steel disc |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 | 120/70-14 / 140/60-13 |
Qlink Star 50 vs Gilera Runner 50 SP Simoncelli — which should you buy?
Picking between the Qlink Star 50 and the Gilera Runner 50 SP Simoncelli usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Qlink Star 50 brings 3 hp in a 77 kg package, while the Gilera Runner 50 SP Simoncelli counters with 5 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: