Qlink Travis 50 vs Kasinski Soft 50 (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Qlink Travis 50stacks up against the Kasinski Soft 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Qlink Travis 50 | Kasinski Soft 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 4 hp |
| Weight | 95 kg | 90 kg |
| Seat height | 31 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.2 L | 0.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | 4-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Optional drum | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 100/80-16 / 100/80-14 | 2.50-17 / 2.75-17 |
Qlink Travis 50 vs Kasinski Soft 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Qlink Travis 50 and the Kasinski Soft 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Qlink Travis 50 brings 4 hp in a 95 kg package, while the Kasinski Soft 50 counters with 4 hp at 90 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: