Qlink Travis 50 vs Longjia Estate 50 4T (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Qlink Travis 50stacks up against the Longjia Estate 50 4T. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Qlink Travis 50 | Longjia Estate 50 4T |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 4 hp |
| Weight | 95 kg | 90 kg |
| Seat height | 31 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.2 L | 1.8 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Optional drum | Single disc. Optional drum |
| Tires | 100/80-16 / 100/80-14 | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 |
Qlink Travis 50 vs Longjia Estate 50 4T — which should you buy?
Picking between the Qlink Travis 50 and the Longjia Estate 50 4T usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Qlink Travis 50 brings 4 hp in a 95 kg package, while the Longjia Estate 50 4T counters with 4 hp at 90 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike:

