Qlink X-ranger 200 vs UM DS 200 (2007)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Qlink X-ranger 200stacks up against the UM DS 200. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Qlink X-ranger 200 | UM DS 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2007 | 2006 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 196 cc | 196 cc |
| Horsepower | 15 hp | — |
| Torque | 15 Nm | — |
| Weight | 135 kg | 123 kg |
| Seat height | 28 mm | 36 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.1 L | 2.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Tires | 100/90-18 / 130/90-15 | 3.0-21 / 4.1-18 |
Qlink X-ranger 200 vs UM DS 200 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Qlink X-ranger 200 and the UM DS 200 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Qlink X-ranger 200 brings 15 hp in a 135 kg package, while the UM DS 200 counters with its own power figure at 123 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: