Qlink XF 200 SM vs Azel Wolf 200 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Qlink XF 200 SMstacks up against the Azel Wolf 200. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Qlink XF 200 SM | Azel Wolf 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2008 | 2010 |
| Price | $2,650 | — |
| Engine | 199 cc | 200 cc |
| Horsepower | 15 hp | 15 hp |
| Torque | 15 Nm | 15 Nm |
| Weight | 123 kg | 135 kg |
| Seat height | 31 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 2.8 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Tires | 110/70-17 / 130/70-17 | 2.15-18 / 2.75-15 |
Qlink XF 200 SM vs Azel Wolf 200 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Qlink XF 200 SM and the Azel Wolf 200 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Qlink XF 200 SM brings 15 hp in a 123 kg package, while the Azel Wolf 200 counters with 15 hp at 135 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: