Qlink XP 200 vs Keeway KXM 200 (2014)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Qlink XP 200stacks up against the Keeway KXM 200. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Qlink XP 200 | Keeway KXM 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2014 |
| Price | $2,650 | — |
| Engine | 199 cc | 200 cc |
| Horsepower | 15 hp | 16 hp |
| Torque | 15 Nm | 15 Nm |
| Weight | 123 kg | 137 kg |
| Seat height | 31 mm | 33 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.8 L | 1.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Tires | 2.75-21 / 4.10-18 | 110/80-17 / 130/80-17 |
Qlink XP 200 vs Keeway KXM 200 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Qlink XP 200 and the Keeway KXM 200 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Qlink XP 200 brings 15 hp in a 123 kg package, while the Keeway KXM 200 counters with 16 hp at 137 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: