Rieju Marathon Pro 200 SM vs Qlink XP 200 (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Rieju Marathon Pro 200 SMstacks up against the Qlink XP 200. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Rieju Marathon Pro 200 SM | Qlink XP 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2011 | 2013 |
| Price | — | $2,650 |
| Engine | 196 cc | 199 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 15 hp |
| Torque | — | 15 Nm |
| Weight | 108 kg | 123 kg |
| Seat height | 35 mm | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.7 L | 2.8 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Galfer Wave, 2-piston caliper. | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Galfer Wave | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 90/90-21 / 120/80-18 | 2.75-21 / 4.10-18 |
Rieju Marathon Pro 200 SM vs Qlink XP 200 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Rieju Marathon Pro 200 SM and the Qlink XP 200 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Rieju Marathon Pro 200 SM brings its published horsepower in a 108 kg package, while the Qlink XP 200 counters with 15 hp at 123 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: