Sachs MadAss 50 vs Peugeot Kisbee 50 Sportline (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Sachs MadAss 50stacks up against the Peugeot Kisbee 50 Sportline. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Sachs MadAss 50 | Peugeot Kisbee 50 Sportline |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2013 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | — |
| Weight | 85 kg | 95 kg |
| Seat height | 33 mm | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.3 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 4-speed | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 90/80-16 / 90/80-16 | — |
Sachs MadAss 50 vs Peugeot Kisbee 50 Sportline — which should you buy?
Picking between the Sachs MadAss 50 and the Peugeot Kisbee 50 Sportline usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Sachs MadAss 50 brings 3 hp in a 85 kg package, while the Peugeot Kisbee 50 Sportline counters with its own power figure at 95 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: