Sachs SpeedForce vs Gilera Runner SP 50 (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Sachs SpeedForcestacks up against the Gilera Runner SP 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Sachs SpeedForce | Gilera Runner SP 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 4 hp |
| Torque | 4 Nm | 5 Nm |
| Weight | 92 kg | — |
| Seat height | 32 mm | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.3 L | 1.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Wave disk | Single disc. Hydraulic with Ø 220 mm stainless steel disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Wave disk | Single disc. Hydraulic with Ø 175 mm stainless steel disc |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 | 120/70-14 / 140/60-13 |
Sachs SpeedForce vs Gilera Runner SP 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Sachs SpeedForce and the Gilera Runner SP 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Sachs SpeedForce brings 3 hp in a 92 kg package, while the Gilera Runner SP 50 counters with 4 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: