Sachs SpeedJet R vs Vento Zip r3i Turbocam (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Sachs SpeedJet Rstacks up against the Vento Zip r3i Turbocam. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Sachs SpeedJet R | Vento Zip r3i Turbocam |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2013 |
| Price | $1,349 | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 5 hp |
| Torque | — | 9 Nm |
| Weight | 87 kg | 65 kg |
| Seat height | 32 mm | 29 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.6 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Wave disc | Single disc. ABS |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 | 100/60-12 / 100/60-12 |
Sachs SpeedJet R vs Vento Zip r3i Turbocam — which should you buy?
Picking between the Sachs SpeedJet R and the Vento Zip r3i Turbocam usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Sachs SpeedJet R brings 4 hp in a 87 kg package, while the Vento Zip r3i Turbocam counters with 5 hp at 65 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: