Sachs SX vs Vento Zip r3i Turbocam (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Sachs SXstacks up against the Vento Zip r3i Turbocam. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Sachs SX | Vento Zip r3i Turbocam |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2013 |
| Price | $1,399 | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 5 hp |
| Torque | 4 Nm | 9 Nm |
| Weight | 108 kg | 65 kg |
| Seat height | 32 mm | 29 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.5 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. ABS |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 | 100/60-12 / 100/60-12 |
Sachs SX vs Vento Zip r3i Turbocam — which should you buy?
Picking between the Sachs SX and the Vento Zip r3i Turbocam usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Sachs SX brings 4 hp in a 108 kg package, while the Vento Zip r3i Turbocam counters with 5 hp at 65 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: