Saxon Firestorm vs Titan Fat Bobber (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Saxon Firestormstacks up against the Titan Fat Bobber. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Saxon Firestorm | Titan Fat Bobber |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 1573 cc | 1573 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 93 hp |
| Torque | — | 144 Nm |
| Weight | 291 kg | — |
| Seat height | 26 mm | 28 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 5.0 L | 3.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Bremo 4-piston calipers | Single disc. 4 piston Thunder Heart Caliper |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Bremo 2-piston calipers | Single disc. 4 piston Thunder Heart Caliper |
| Tires | 90/90-21 / 260-18 | 120/70-21 / 260/40-18 |
Saxon Firestorm vs Titan Fat Bobber — which should you buy?
Picking between the Saxon Firestorm and the Titan Fat Bobber usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Saxon Firestorm brings its published horsepower in a 291 kg package, while the Titan Fat Bobber counters with 93 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: