Scomadi TL50 vs KSR Cracker 50 4T (2017)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Scomadi TL50stacks up against the KSR Cracker 50 4T. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Scomadi TL50 | KSR Cracker 50 4T |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2017 | 2017 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 4 hp |
| Torque | 3 Nm | — |
| Weight | 89 kg | — |
| Seat height | 31 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 2.9 L | 1.1 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Sealed multidisc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 110/70-12 / 110/70-12 | — |
Scomadi TL50 vs KSR Cracker 50 4T — which should you buy?
Picking between the Scomadi TL50 and the KSR Cracker 50 4T usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Scomadi TL50 brings 3 hp in a 89 kg package, while the KSR Cracker 50 4T counters with 4 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: