Sherco SE 50 vs Puma Falcon CR50 Cross (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Sherco SE 50stacks up against the Puma Falcon CR50 Cross. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Sherco SE 50 | Puma Falcon CR50 Cross |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2011 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 4 hp |
| Weight | 83 kg | 108 kg |
| Seat height | 36 mm | 38 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.9 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic, AJP | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic, AJP | Single disc |
| Tires | 1.61-21 / 2.15-18 | 80/100-21 / 110/100-18 |
Sherco SE 50 vs Puma Falcon CR50 Cross — which should you buy?
Picking between the Sherco SE 50 and the Puma Falcon CR50 Cross usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Sherco SE 50 brings its published horsepower in a 83 kg package, while the Puma Falcon CR50 Cross counters with 4 hp at 108 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: