Sherco Shark 50 CC SM vs Beta RR Motard 50 Alu (2005)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Sherco Shark 50 CC SMstacks up against the Beta RR Motard 50 Alu. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Sherco Shark 50 CC SM | Beta RR Motard 50 Alu |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2005 | 2004 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Weight | 83 kg | 85 kg |
| Seat height | 36 mm | 36 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 1.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | — | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | — | Single disc |
| Tires | — | 110/80-17 / 130/70-17 |
Sherco Shark 50 CC SM vs Beta RR Motard 50 Alu — which should you buy?
Picking between the Sherco Shark 50 CC SM and the Beta RR Motard 50 Alu usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Sherco Shark 50 CC SM brings its published horsepower in a 83 kg package, while the Beta RR Motard 50 Alu counters with its own power figure at 85 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: