Sherco ST Cabestany Replica vs Sherco ST 3.2 F (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Sherco ST Cabestany Replicastacks up against the Sherco ST 3.2 F. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Sherco ST Cabestany Replica | Sherco ST 3.2 F |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2011 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 300 cc | 317 cc |
| Weight | 67 kg | 70 kg |
| Seat height | 25 mm | 25 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 0.8 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic | Single disc. Hydraulic |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic | Single disc. Hydraulic |
Sherco ST Cabestany Replica vs Sherco ST 3.2 F — which should you buy?
Picking between the Sherco ST Cabestany Replica and the Sherco ST 3.2 F usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Sherco ST Cabestany Replica brings its published horsepower in a 67 kg package, while the Sherco ST 3.2 F counters with its own power figure at 70 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: