Sherco Urban SU 50 vs Generic Trigger X 50 Competition (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Sherco Urban SU 50stacks up against the Generic Trigger X 50 Competition. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Sherco Urban SU 50 | Generic Trigger X 50 Competition |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 2 hp |
| Torque | — | 3 Nm |
| Weight | 83 kg | 96 kg |
| Seat height | 34 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.9 L | 2.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Hydraulically activated AJP, floating disc | Single disc. Wave disk |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Wave disk |
| Tires | 2.50-17 / 3.50-17 | 3.00-21 / 4.10-18 |
Sherco Urban SU 50 vs Generic Trigger X 50 Competition — which should you buy?
Picking between the Sherco Urban SU 50 and the Generic Trigger X 50 Competition usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Sherco Urban SU 50 brings its published horsepower in a 83 kg package, while the Generic Trigger X 50 Competition counters with 2 hp at 96 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: