Suzuki Address V125 Fuel Injection vs Keeway Vivo 125 (2016)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Suzuki Address V125 Fuel Injectionstacks up against the Keeway Vivo 125. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Suzuki Address V125 Fuel Injection | Keeway Vivo 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2016 | 2016 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 8 hp |
| Torque | — | 8 Nm |
| Weight | 105 kg | 108 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.7 L | 2.0 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 4-speed | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 70/90-17 / 80/90-17 | 90/90-12 / 100/90-10 |
Suzuki Address V125 Fuel Injection vs Keeway Vivo 125 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Suzuki Address V125 Fuel Injection and the Keeway Vivo 125 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Suzuki Address V125 Fuel Injection brings its published horsepower in a 105 kg package, while the Keeway Vivo 125 counters with 8 hp at 108 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: