Suzuki AN 400 Burgman vs Sachs FYM 400 (2008)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Suzuki AN 400 Burgmanstacks up against the Sachs FYM 400. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Suzuki AN 400 Burgman | Sachs FYM 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2003 | 2008 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 385 cc | 394 cc |
| Horsepower | 32 hp | 27 hp |
| Torque | 32 Nm | 28 Nm |
| Weight | 179 kg | 180 kg |
| Seat height | 27 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 3.4 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 110/90-13 / 130/70-13 | 120/70-16 / 140/60-16 |
Suzuki AN 400 Burgman vs Sachs FYM 400 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Suzuki AN 400 Burgman and the Sachs FYM 400 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Suzuki AN 400 Burgman brings 32 hp in a 179 kg package, while the Sachs FYM 400 counters with 27 hp at 180 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: