Suzuki Burgman 400Z vs Italjet Marco Polo 400 (2016)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Suzuki Burgman 400Zstacks up against the Italjet Marco Polo 400. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Suzuki Burgman 400Z | Italjet Marco Polo 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2016 | 2008 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 398 cc | 398 cc |
| Horsepower | 33 hp | — |
| Torque | 34 Nm | — |
| Weight | — | 181 kg |
| Seat height | 28 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 3.5 L | 3.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Double disc. Digital ABS | Double disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Digital ABS | Single disc |
| Tires | 120/80-14 / 150/70-13 | 120/70-16 / 140/60-16 |
Suzuki Burgman 400Z vs Italjet Marco Polo 400 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Suzuki Burgman 400Z and the Italjet Marco Polo 400 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Suzuki Burgman 400Z brings 33 hp, while the Italjet Marco Polo 400 counters with its own power figure at 181 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: