Suzuki Gemma vs Puma Navona 250 (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Suzuki Gemmastacks up against the Puma Navona 250. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Suzuki Gemma | Puma Navona 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 249 cc | 249 cc |
| Horsepower | 22 hp | 22 hp |
| Torque | 22 Nm | — |
| Weight | 205 kg | 140 kg |
| Seat height | 28 mm | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 3.2 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic | Single disc |
| Tires | 120/80-14 / 150/70-13 | 130/70-12 / 130/70-12 |
Suzuki Gemma vs Puma Navona 250 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Suzuki Gemma and the Puma Navona 250 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Suzuki Gemma brings 22 hp in a 205 kg package, while the Puma Navona 250 counters with 22 hp at 140 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: