Suzuki Gemma vs Qingqi Grampus QM250T (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Suzuki Gemmastacks up against the Qingqi Grampus QM250T. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Suzuki Gemma | Qingqi Grampus QM250T |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 249 cc | 249 cc |
| Horsepower | 22 hp | 19 hp |
| Torque | 22 Nm | 19 Nm |
| Weight | 205 kg | 177 kg |
| Seat height | 28 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 3.2 L | 3.2 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/80-14 / 150/70-13 | 120/70-15 / 140/70-14 |
Suzuki Gemma vs Qingqi Grampus QM250T — which should you buy?
Picking between the Suzuki Gemma and the Qingqi Grampus QM250T usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Suzuki Gemma brings 22 hp in a 205 kg package, while the Qingqi Grampus QM250T counters with 19 hp at 177 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: