Suzuki Grass Tracker Big Boy vs James Commodore 250 (2016)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Suzuki Grass Tracker Big Boystacks up against the James Commodore 250. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Suzuki Grass Tracker Big Boy | James Commodore 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2016 | 1962 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 249 cc | 249 cc |
| Horsepower | 19 hp | — |
| Torque | 21 Nm | — |
| Weight | 136 kg | — |
| Seat height | 30 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 2.2 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 100/90-18 / 120/80-17 | 3.25-18 / 3.25-18 |
Suzuki Grass Tracker Big Boy vs James Commodore 250 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Suzuki Grass Tracker Big Boy and the James Commodore 250 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Suzuki Grass Tracker Big Boy brings 19 hp in a 136 kg package, while the James Commodore 250 counters with its own power figure.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: