Sym Quad Lander 300 vs E-Ton Vector ST VXL-300 (2011)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Sym Quad Lander 300stacks up against the E-Ton Vector ST VXL-300. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Sym Quad Lander 300 | E-Ton Vector ST VXL-300 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2011 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 287 cc | 287 cc |
| Weight | 243 kg | 225 kg |
| Seat height | — | 35 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 3.2 L | 3.2 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Double disc. Hydraulic | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. With parking | Single disc |
| Tires | 21/7-10 / 22/10-10 | 21/7-10 / 22/10-10 |
Sym Quad Lander 300 vs E-Ton Vector ST VXL-300 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Sym Quad Lander 300 and the E-Ton Vector ST VXL-300 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Sym Quad Lander 300 brings its published horsepower in a 243 kg package, while the E-Ton Vector ST VXL-300 counters with its own power figure at 225 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike:

