Tank Sports Urban Econo 50 vs Kymco Active SR (2008)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Tank Sports Urban Econo 50stacks up against the Kymco Active SR. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Tank Sports Urban Econo 50 | Kymco Active SR |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2008 | 2008 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 2 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | — | 3 Nm |
| Weight | 84 kg | 94 kg |
| Seat height | 28 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.0 L | 0.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | 4-speed |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 3.00-10 / 3.00-10 | 2.50-17 / 2.75-17 |
Tank Sports Urban Econo 50 vs Kymco Active SR — which should you buy?
Picking between the Tank Sports Urban Econo 50 and the Kymco Active SR usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Tank Sports Urban Econo 50 brings 2 hp in a 84 kg package, while the Kymco Active SR counters with 3 hp at 94 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: