TGB 203 50 vs Kreidler Florett RMC-E 50 Race (2008)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the TGB 203 50stacks up against the Kreidler Florett RMC-E 50 Race. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | TGB 203 50 | Kreidler Florett RMC-E 50 Race |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2008 | 2008 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 5 hp | 4 hp |
| Weight | 81 kg | 89 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | 34 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 1.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 | 110/70-12 / 110/70-12 |
TGB 203 50 vs Kreidler Florett RMC-E 50 Race — which should you buy?
Picking between the TGB 203 50 and the Kreidler Florett RMC-E 50 Race usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the TGB 203 50 brings 5 hp in a 81 kg package, while the Kreidler Florett RMC-E 50 Race counters with 4 hp at 89 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: