TGB 203 50 vs MBK MachG AC (2008)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the TGB 203 50stacks up against the MBK MachG AC. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | TGB 203 50 | MBK MachG AC |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2008 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 5 hp | 2 hp |
| Torque | — | 2 Nm |
| Weight | 81 kg | 76 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 1.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Disc, Ø 190 |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake). Drum, Ø 110 |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 | 110/70-12 / 130/70-12 |
TGB 203 50 vs MBK MachG AC — which should you buy?
Picking between the TGB 203 50 and the MBK MachG AC usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the TGB 203 50 brings 5 hp in a 81 kg package, while the MBK MachG AC counters with 2 hp at 76 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: