TGB R50X vs MBK Booster NG Next Generation (2008)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the TGB R50Xstacks up against the MBK Booster NG Next Generation. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | TGB R50X | MBK Booster NG Next Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2008 | 2006 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 4 hp |
| Torque | — | 4 Nm |
| Weight | 95 kg | 78 kg |
| Seat height | — | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.8 L | 6.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 130/60-13 / 130/60-13 | 120/90-10 / 130/90-10 |
TGB R50X vs MBK Booster NG Next Generation — which should you buy?
Picking between the TGB R50X and the MBK Booster NG Next Generation usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the TGB R50X brings its published horsepower in a 95 kg package, while the MBK Booster NG Next Generation counters with 4 hp at 78 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: