TGB Tapo 50 vs KSR Jump 50 (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the TGB Tapo 50stacks up against the KSR Jump 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | TGB Tapo 50 | KSR Jump 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 5 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | — | 4 Nm |
| Weight | 94 kg | 86 kg |
| Fuel capacity | 1.8 L | 1.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 | 2.50-10 / 2.50-10 |
TGB Tapo 50 vs KSR Jump 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the TGB Tapo 50 and the KSR Jump 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the TGB Tapo 50 brings 5 hp in a 94 kg package, while the KSR Jump 50 counters with 3 hp at 86 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: