Tomos MC50 Junior vs Beta RR 50 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Tomos MC50 Juniorstacks up against the Beta RR 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Tomos MC50 Junior | Beta RR 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2003 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 2 hp | — |
| Weight | 89 kg | 90 kg |
| Seat height | 25 mm | 36 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 0.7 L | 1.8 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | — |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | — |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | — |
| Tires | 2.50-10 / 2.50-10 | — |
Tomos MC50 Junior vs Beta RR 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Tomos MC50 Junior and the Beta RR 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Tomos MC50 Junior brings 2 hp in a 89 kg package, while the Beta RR 50 counters with its own power figure at 90 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: