Triton Carbon 400 vs Barossa MAM 250 (2011)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Triton Carbon 400stacks up against the Barossa MAM 250. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Triton Carbon 400 | Barossa MAM 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2011 | 2009 |
| Price | $6,290 | — |
| Engine | 236 cc | 238 cc |
| Horsepower | 20 hp | — |
| Weight | 224 kg | 180 kg |
| Seat height | 26 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 3.9 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 165/70-10 / 225/40-10 | 21/7-10 / 21/10-8 |
Triton Carbon 400 vs Barossa MAM 250 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Triton Carbon 400 and the Barossa MAM 250 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Triton Carbon 400 brings 20 hp in a 224 kg package, while the Barossa MAM 250 counters with its own power figure at 180 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: