UM DSF 125 vs Clipic Tronic 125cc (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the UM DSF 125stacks up against the Clipic Tronic 125cc. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | UM DSF 125 | Clipic Tronic 125cc |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Weight | 122 kg | 116 kg |
| Seat height | 36 mm | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.6 L | 2.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 3.00-21 / 4.10-18 | 2.75-21 / 4.10-18 |
UM DSF 125 vs Clipic Tronic 125cc — which should you buy?
Picking between the UM DSF 125 and the Clipic Tronic 125cc usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the UM DSF 125 brings its published horsepower in a 122 kg package, while the Clipic Tronic 125cc counters with its own power figure at 116 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: