UM DTF-110 vs Cleveland FXR (2016)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the UM DTF-110stacks up against the Cleveland FXR. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | UM DTF-110 | Cleveland FXR |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2007 | 2016 |
| Price | $1,449 | — |
| Engine | 107 cc | 110 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 7 hp |
| Torque | — | 7 Nm |
| Weight | 69 kg | 74 kg |
| Seat height | 27 mm | 33 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.5 L | 0.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 4-speed | 4-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Tires | — | 80/100-21 / 80/100-21 |
UM DTF-110 vs Cleveland FXR — which should you buy?
Picking between the UM DTF-110 and the Cleveland FXR usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the UM DTF-110 brings its published horsepower in a 69 kg package, while the Cleveland FXR counters with 7 hp at 74 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike:

