UM Fastwind 150 vs Kymco Stryker (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the UM Fastwind 150stacks up against the Kymco Stryker. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | UM Fastwind 150 | Kymco Stryker |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 150 cc | 150 cc |
| Torque | — | 11 Nm |
| Weight | 127 kg | 142 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 4.6 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 110/90-16 | 90/90-21 / 130/80-17 |
UM Fastwind 150 vs Kymco Stryker — which should you buy?
Picking between the UM Fastwind 150 and the Kymco Stryker usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the UM Fastwind 150 brings its published horsepower in a 127 kg package, while the Kymco Stryker counters with its own power figure at 142 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: