UM GP1-R 150 vs E-Ton Matrix R4 150 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the UM GP1-R 150stacks up against the E-Ton Matrix R4 150. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | UM GP1-R 150 | E-Ton Matrix R4 150 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 150 cc | 150 cc |
| Weight | 100 kg | 113 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 1.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 |
UM GP1-R 150 vs E-Ton Matrix R4 150 — which should you buy?
Picking between the UM GP1-R 150 and the E-Ton Matrix R4 150 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the UM GP1-R 150 brings its published horsepower in a 100 kg package, while the E-Ton Matrix R4 150 counters with its own power figure at 113 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: