UM Matrix 150 vs Pagsta Eagle 150 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the UM Matrix 150stacks up against the Pagsta Eagle 150. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | UM Matrix 150 | Pagsta Eagle 150 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 150 cc | 150 cc |
| Horsepower | 10 hp | 10 hp |
| Torque | 10 Nm | 11 Nm |
| Weight | 102 kg | 114 kg |
| Seat height | — | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.6 L | 1.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 130/60-13 / 130/60-13 |
UM Matrix 150 vs Pagsta Eagle 150 — which should you buy?
Picking between the UM Matrix 150 and the Pagsta Eagle 150 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the UM Matrix 150 brings 10 hp in a 102 kg package, while the Pagsta Eagle 150 counters with 10 hp at 114 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: