UM X-Peed 50 vs Piaggio Fly 50 4T (2006)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the UM X-Peed 50stacks up against the Piaggio Fly 50 4T. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | UM X-Peed 50 | Piaggio Fly 50 4T |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2006 | 2006 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 4 hp |
| Weight | 85 kg | 100 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.3 L | 1.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc. ABS system. | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 | — |
UM X-Peed 50 vs Piaggio Fly 50 4T — which should you buy?
Picking between the UM X-Peed 50 and the Piaggio Fly 50 4T usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the UM X-Peed 50 brings its published horsepower in a 85 kg package, while the Piaggio Fly 50 4T counters with 4 hp at 100 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: