Ural De Luxe vs Ural M 66 (with sidecar) (2000)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Ural De Luxestacks up against the Ural M 66 (with sidecar). Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Ural De Luxe | Ural M 66 (with sidecar) |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2000 | 1975 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 650 cc | 650 cc |
| Horsepower | 32 hp | 32 hp |
| Torque | 47 Nm | — |
| Weight | 340 kg | — |
| Seat height | 33 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | — | 5.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 4-speed | 4-speed |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake | Expanding brake |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake | Expanding brake |
| Tires | — | 3.75-19 / 3.75-19 |
Ural De Luxe vs Ural M 66 (with sidecar) — which should you buy?
Picking between the Ural De Luxe and the Ural M 66 (with sidecar) usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Ural De Luxe brings 32 hp in a 340 kg package, while the Ural M 66 (with sidecar) counters with 32 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: