Ural M 66 vs Norton C 652 SM International (1999)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Ural M 66stacks up against the Norton C 652 SM International. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Ural M 66 | Norton C 652 SM International |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 1975 | 1999 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 650 cc | 652 cc |
| Horsepower | 32 hp | 48 hp |
| Torque | — | 57 Nm |
| Seat height | — | 33 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 5.6 L | 5.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 4-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake | Single disc |
| Tires | 3.75-19 / 3.75-19 | 110/70-17 / 130/70-17 |
Ural M 66 vs Norton C 652 SM International — which should you buy?
Picking between the Ural M 66 and the Norton C 652 SM International usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Ural M 66 brings 32 hp, while the Norton C 652 SM International counters with 48 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: