Ural M 67-6 (with sidecar) vs Honda CX 650 E (1992)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Ural M 67-6 (with sidecar)stacks up against the Honda CX 650 E. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Ural M 67-6 (with sidecar) | Honda CX 650 E |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 1992 | 1985 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 650 cc | 673 cc |
| Horsepower | 38 hp | 65 hp |
| Fuel capacity | 5.0 L | 5.0 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 4-speed with reverse | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake | Dual disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake | Single disc |
| Tires | 3.75-19 / 3.75-19 | 100/90-18 / 120/90-18 |
Ural M 67-6 (with sidecar) vs Honda CX 650 E — which should you buy?
Picking between the Ural M 67-6 (with sidecar) and the Honda CX 650 E usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Ural M 67-6 (with sidecar) brings 38 hp, while the Honda CX 650 E counters with 65 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: