Ural M 67 vs Kawasaki KLR® 650 S ABS (2026)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Ural M 67stacks up against the Kawasaki KLR® 650 S ABS. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Ural M 67 | Kawasaki KLR® 650 S ABS |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 1993 | 2026 |
| Price | — | $7,299 |
| Engine | 649 cc | 652 cc |
| Horsepower | 36 hp | — |
| Torque | 43 Nm | — |
| Weight | 225 kg | 189 kg |
| Seat height | 32 mm | 815 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 5.0 L | 23.0 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 4-speed | Manual, 5 speed, Chain |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake | Hydraulic Disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake | Hydraulic Disc |
| Tires | — | 90/90 R21 54S / 130/80 R17 65S |
Ural M 67 vs Kawasaki KLR® 650 S ABS — which should you buy?
Picking between the Ural M 67 and the Kawasaki KLR® 650 S ABS usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Ural M 67 brings 36 hp in a 225 kg package, while the Kawasaki KLR® 650 S ABS counters with its own power figure at 189 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: