Ural Ranger Frog vs Ural Retro Solo (2014)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Ural Ranger Frogstacks up against the Ural Retro Solo. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Ural Ranger Frog | Ural Retro Solo |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2014 | 2011 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 745 cc | 745 cc |
| Horsepower | 39 hp | 39 hp |
| Torque | 52 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Weight | 350 kg | 246 kg |
| Seat height | 31 mm | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 5.0 L | 5.0 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 4-speed | 4-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | — | 3.50-18 / 3.50-18 |
Ural Ranger Frog vs Ural Retro Solo — which should you buy?
Picking between the Ural Ranger Frog and the Ural Retro Solo usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Ural Ranger Frog brings 39 hp in a 350 kg package, while the Ural Retro Solo counters with 39 hp at 246 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: