Ural Ranger vs Beta RR 50 Alu (2007)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Ural Rangerstacks up against the Beta RR 50 Alu. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Ural Ranger | Beta RR 50 Alu |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2007 | 2006 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Torque | 2 Nm | — |
| Weight | — | 85 kg |
| Fuel capacity | 0.9 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | — | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | — | Single disc |
| Tires | — | 80/90-21 / 110/80-18 |
Ural Ranger vs Beta RR 50 Alu — which should you buy?
Picking between the Ural Ranger and the Beta RR 50 Alu usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Ural Ranger brings its published horsepower, while the Beta RR 50 Alu counters with its own power figure at 85 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: