Ural Ranger vs Lem CX3 SR (2007)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Ural Rangerstacks up against the Lem CX3 SR. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Ural Ranger | Lem CX3 SR |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2007 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 7 hp |
| Torque | 2 Nm | — |
| Weight | — | 50 kg |
| Fuel capacity | 0.9 L | 0.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | 1-speed |
| Front brakes | — | Double disc |
| Rear brakes | — | Single disc |
Ural Ranger vs Lem CX3 SR — which should you buy?
Picking between the Ural Ranger and the Lem CX3 SR usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Ural Ranger brings its published horsepower, while the Lem CX3 SR counters with 7 hp at 50 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: